Territory connected to decisions
Define who receives a social signal and which decision they can make within the organization.
Social architecture
Manage social risk, community relationships and impact with SR Reset. Connect territorial assessment, commitments and measurement to your operation.
Discuss my projectThe challenge
Every project happens inside a territory with social, community, institutional, and cultural dynamics that can directly influence its progress. When these variables aren't understood or managed in time, they generate delays, tensions, loss of trust, cost overruns, and reputational risk.
Services
Project stage and territorial conditions guide the starting point. Scope is defined with the context.
Operations face signals of tension or missed commitments.
Signals, owners and a path for addressing risks.
View scope →
Community dialogue exists, but commitments lack follow-up.
An engagement plan and commitment register.
View scope →
You need to understand the territory before intervening.
An assessment of stakeholders, perceptions and risks for decisions.
View scope →
Activities are completed without explaining what changed.
Measurement that distinguishes activity from outcomes.
View scope →
The RESET Method applied to SR Reset
We apply the RESET methodology to social management: understand the territory, evaluate risks, design a solution, execute with accountable owners and retain evidence of every decision and outcome.
01
We examine the territory, stakeholders, commitments and available evidence.
02
We prioritize social risks, gaps and opportunities by impact and feasibility.
03
We design the strategy, participation mechanisms, indicators and accountable owners.
04
We implement the plan with territorial coordination, training and follow-up.
05
We record commitments and outcomes, measure progress and adjust using evidence.
Capabilities and sectors
We integrate social risk, territorial intelligence, stakeholder management, ESG, territorial governance, training, and impact measurement.
01 · Indicators
Social risk, community acceptance, territorial conflict, participation, SROI, and social-investment efficiency, defined for each project.
02 · ESG
Stakeholders, participation, inclusion, materiality, and reporting connected to territorial reality.
03 · Training
Training, webinars, technical support, and methodology transfer.
04 · Sectors
Companies and projects; energy and infrastructure; water and sanitation; public sector; foundations; communities and territory.
Sustainability and management
SDGs help prioritize contributions; the social dimension of ESG organizes management issues; social investment defines interventions and resources. Choose around the decision you need to make.
Intervention principles
We integrate participation, a rights-informed approach, inclusion, response mechanisms, and responsible information management in proportion to each project’s risk and context.
01 · Participation
Processes adapted to territory, language, culture, and the actual participation capacity of the groups involved.
02 · Response
Accessible channels, records, owners, response times, escalation, and verifiable closure.
03 · Inclusion
Identification of differentiated impacts, access barriers, and specific measures for safe and equitable participation.
04 · Ethics
Proportional collection, consent when applicable, confidentiality, and information use connected to a legitimate decision.
How to compare proposals
Define who receives a social signal and which decision they can make within the organization.
Agree records, owners and evidence for reviewing response and closure.
Fit channels, field presence and tools to the project’s actual capacity.
Before defining scope
Yes. Assessment and due diligence support decisions; risk control and engagement track operations and commitments.
Project, country or territory, stage, observed situation and pending decision. That context defines what to review and which further information is needed.
Field presence, channels, frequency and team are agreed around location, exposure and project needs.
Risk, signal or commitment records identify the source, owner, status and response evidence. Indicators are defined around the objective.
When you need to prioritize SDG contributions, actions and indicators. For territorial risk or engagement, start with the corresponding service.
Additional scopes
If you already have a defined objective, explore these related services.
Assess stakeholders, impacts, conflict and commitments before investing. Identify social risks and management capacity to inform the project decision.
View scope →
Identify influence, interests and relationships among territorial stakeholders. Use the map to prioritize dialogue, risks and engagement commitments.
View scope →
Design a strategy for legitimacy and trust within the territory. Connect participation, commitments and operational consistency to sustain relationships.
View scope →
Prioritize social investment through a theory of change, baseline and objectives. Define resources, owners and indicators to evaluate the intervention.
View scope →
Manage the social dimension of ESG through stakeholders, materiality and indicators. Connect commitments, governance and territorial evidence.
View scope →
Translate the Sustainable Development Goals into priorities, actions and indicators. Define owners and evidence around your sector and territory.
View scope →
Integrate assessment, strategy, field presence and measurement for projects with high social exposure. Coordinate owners and follow-up within one model.
View scope →
Other strategic capabilities
Close
Let's talk about strengthening the sustainability, traceability, and continuity of your next project.
Discuss my project